I constantly bemoan the joys of using disks from other sites, even when they actually work. Today, I’ve had to deal with one that didn’t quite function properly, although the fault is yet to be determined.
We had a patient who came to our GE site from a McKesson site, armed with three disks containing her imaging history. Since GE wanted $50,000 to place a dedicated CD-reader on the Centricity 3.x system, we use one of the Advantage Workstations (Version 4.3) instead to load outside studies onto our system. Most of the time, this seems to work adequately.
However, with this patient, once the data was pushed to PACS, all images, CR, CT, and MRI, came out looking like this:
I’ve tried changing every setting I can think of, but to no avail.
In a word, HELP!!!! Please comment below or send ideas to doctordalai (AT) gmail.com.
By the way, I was called upon yesterday to read a study remotely from the GE site via the old Centricity Web which has not been replaced for various reasons. Using it is an exercise in agony. Frankly, and I have told this to GE execs, it is the WORST PACS viewing software ever released. The images themselves do display properly, but it is balky, unstable, slow, and basically non-diagnostic when called upon to function as a viewer in the field. I’m asking GE to do the right thing and withdraw it from the market, replacing it at no charge with either the Dynamic Imaging PACS or the newer GE Universal viewer. Even eFilm would be a step up, and I HATE eFilm.
Rant over, for the moment. Thank you for your attention.
via Blogger http://doctordalai.blogspot.com/2013/09/fuzzy-pacs.html September 13, 2013 at 11:22AM